J Rhinol > Volume 32(2); 2025
Oh and Heo: A Case of Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis Mimicking Chronic Sinusitis With Polyp

Abstract

A diagnosis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) can be challenging due to its diverse and nonspecific clinical manifestations, and it is often misdiagnosed as a simple inflammatory disease. Since the nasal septum is the most commonly involved site in the nose, GPA is typically suspected in cases presenting with septal perforation or inflammation. It is very rare for the septum to remain intact while GPA involves only the sinus, which may lead to misdiagnosis as simple sinusitis. A 64-year-old man visited our hospital after being diagnosed with chronic sinusitis at a private clinic. He showed no abnormalities in the septum, but pansinusitis was noted on computed tomography, and GPA was suspected based on a biopsy of a mass resembling a nasal polyp performed in the outpatient setting. The diagnosis of GPA was ultimately confirmed through further laboratory evaluation. Here, we present a case of GPA and review the recently revised diagnostic criteria for GPA.

INTRODUCTION

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), formerly known as Wegener granulomatosis, is defined by necrotizing granulomatous inflammation involving the upper and lower respiratory tracts, along with necrotizing vasculitis primarily affecting small to medium-sized vessels, often accompanied by necrotizing glomerulonephritis [1]. GPA was historically considered a severe and life-threatening disease, with untreated cases demonstrating a mean survival of only 5 months due to the risk of renal or pulmonary failure. However, advancements in immunosuppressive therapies have significantly improved patient outcomes, with the median survival now estimated at 21.7 years after diagnosis. Early recognition and intervention are critical to improving long-term prognosis [2].
Unfortunately, 94% of patients are initially misdiagnosed with a simple inflammatory disease by the otolaryngology department [3]. This underscores the important role of otolaryngologists in the management of GPA patients. The most common nasal symptoms include foul-smelling rhinorrhea, epistaxis, erythematous mucosa, crusting, and granulation tissue formation. The nasal septum is most frequently involved, with extension to the sinuses occurring in some cases [4,5]. During the active phase, GPA typically affects the nasal cavity and septum, leading to crust formation and nasal obstruction, and can also result in septal perforation [6]. In this report, we present a case of GPA mimicking chronic sinusitis with polyp and review the updated diagnostic criteria.

CASE REPORT

A 64-year-old man presented to a local clinic with a three-month history of nasal congestion and olfactory disturbance. Nasal endoscopy revealed polyp-like masses in both nasal cavities, and he was subsequently referred to our hospital. The patient had a history of multiple treatments for sinusitis, and more recently had experienced nasal congestion, intermittent rhinorrhea, and headache. Polyp-like masses were noted in the middle meatus (Fig. 1A), and paranasal computed tomography (CT) demonstrated soft tissue density throughout the bilateral sinuses (Fig. 1B). As the endoscopic and CT findings suggested pansinusitis with nasal polyps, endoscopic sinus surgery was scheduled, and a punch biopsy was performed on a mass in the left nasal cavity to rule out tumors such as inverted papilloma. There were no abnormalities in the nasal septum or turbinate mucosa.
While awaiting surgery, histopathological analysis of the punch biopsy revealed chronic inflammation with poorly formed granulomas and focal necrosis, along with infiltration by mixed inflammatory cells including plasma cells, neutrophils, and a few eosinophils. However, there were no granulomas within an artery or in the perivascular area of an artery or arteriole. GPA was suspected, and further laboratory and radiological examinations were conducted. Laboratory testing showed a positive cytoplasmic-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (C-ANCA) result, confirmed by positive proteinase-3 (PR-3) antibody (Fig. 2). Although C-ANCA demonstrates 90%–95% sensitivity in acute generalized GPA and 60% sensitivity in early or localized disease [7], GPA could not be diagnosed definitively at that time, as C-ANCA was not included in the diagnostic criteria. During evaluation for GPA, the patient presented to the emergency room with subacute dyspnea. Chest CT revealed a newly developed left hilar mass (Fig. 3A), and both main bronchi were narrowed by multiple cavitary lesions (Fig. 3B). Ultimately, the patient was diagnosed with GPA prior to undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery and was admitted to the rheumatology department, where he is receiving combination therapy with cyclophosphamide and prednisolone. During hospitalization, the patient reported nasal pain, and non-endoscopic examination revealed severe crusting around the middle turbinate (Fig. 4A). After conservative treatment, the middle turbinate and uncinate process were absent, but endoscopic and CT findings of the nasal mucosa and sinuses showed improvement (Fig. 4B and C). The patient is currently under medical management in the rheumatology department.

DISCUSSION

The diagnosis of GPA begins with clinical suspicion based on symptoms and physical findings. Sinonasal involvement is the most common manifestation of GPA in the head and neck region, affecting approximately 85% of patients. Notably, more than 25% of patients present solely with sinonasal symptoms [2,8]. While nasal obstruction and discharge are the most common symptoms, clinical manifestations can range from mild nasal obstruction to significant structural damage involving the external nose, paranasal sinuses, and skull base. Hyposmia or anosmia frequently occurs when the nasal mucosa is extensively involved, resulting in mucosal swelling. Additionally, cacosmia may develop due to purulent discharge and bacterial colonization, such as infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus [6]. Sinonasal involvement typically begins in the anterior septum area, which is supplied by the Kiesselbach plexus, and then extends to the paranasal sinuses [5,9]. Involvement of the nasal septum can cause perforation, which may be identified by a whistling sound, and in advanced cases can progress to saddle nose deformity [10]. Mucosal abnormalities in the nasopharynx and paranasal sinuses are well characterized and range from granulomatous lesions to diffuse mucosal thickening [7]. Although these clinical symptoms and signs are commonly observed in GPA, they are not highly specific for the differential diagnosis and may vary depending on the disease activity at the time of examination [4]. In the present case, the nasal septum exhibited normal mucosa and no abnormal findings at the time of initial diagnosis.
According to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria [11], GPA is diagnosed if two or more of the following four criteria are met: 1) inflammation of the sinus or oral cavity, 2) abnormal findings on lung X-ray, such as nodules, a fixed pulmonary infiltrate, or cavitary lesion, 3) hematuria or red cell casts in the urinary sediment, and 4) presence of histological granulomas within an artery or in the perivascular area of an artery or arteriole. The sensitivity and specificity of the 1990 ACR criteria are 88% and 92%, respectively. The 1990 ACR criteria have been effective and widely accepted in the medical community, playing a significant role in standardizing the diagnosis of GPA and promoting consistency in research and clinical practice [12]. However, these criteria lack detailed histopathological descriptions and do not include ANCA testing, making diagnosis difficult in certain cases. In disease flares, C-ANCA testing demonstrates a sensitivity of 65%–91% and a specificity of 96%–99% [13]. In March 2022, a revised classification for GPA was introduced following consensus that the ANCA test, widely used since 1985 and known for its high sensitivity and specificity, should be included in the criteria [14].
In the revised classification for GPA, nasal involvement and C-ANCA positivity carry the highest weights, with scores of 3 and 5 points, respectively. As a total of 5 or more points is sufficient for diagnosis, C-ANCA positivity alone is adequate for diagnosing GPA in patients presenting to otolaryngology with sinusitis or rhinitis when suspicion is high. Although tissue biopsy of an affected organ remains necessary for differentiating GPA from neoplastic or infectious diseases, only 16% of GPA patients have all three classic histological features of vasculitis, necrotizing inflammation, and chronic granulomatous inflammation [6]. Furthermore, up to 50% of biopsy specimens may be non-diagnostic, so repeat biopsies may be required in some patients [15]. Serologic tests and chest radiographs may facilitate more rapid diagnosis than biopsy, as results are typically available within a few days. In the present case, the 2022 ACR criteria had not yet been published at the time of diagnosis, so a diagnosis could not be established based on sinonasal symptoms and C-ANCA positivity alone, and surgery was planned for both diagnostic and therapeutic reasons. However, applying the 2022 ACR criteria would have allowed for an earlier diagnosis, prior to the onset of pulmonary symptoms.
Because otolaryngologists are often the first to encounter patients with GPA, it is essential to remain up-to-date with newly revised diagnostic criteria and to facilitate rapid diagnosis and treatment through a thorough diagnostic workup. Diagnosing GPA in patients presenting only with sinusitis and polyps can be challenging. Nevertheless, ENT physicians should always consider the possibility of GPA in patients with sinusitis and pursue appropriate testing to avoid unnecessary surgical interventions.

Notes

Ethics Statement

The patient has provided informed consent for publication of the case and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital (No. 20230541).

Availability of Data and Material

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Sung Jae Heo. Data curation: Minji Oh, Sung Jae Heo. Formal analysis: Minji Oh, Sung Jae Heo. Investigation: Minji Oh. Methodology: Minji Oh, Sung Jae Heo. Supervision: Sung Jae Heo. Validation: Sung Jae Heo. Writing—original draft: Minji Oh. Writing—review & editing: Sung Jae Heo.

Funding Statement

None

Acknowledgments

None

Fig. 1.
Nasal endoscopy and computed tomography (CT) view. A polyp-like mass is observed in the right middle meatus (A, white arrow), and paranasal sinus CT reveals soft tissue density throughout the bilateral sinuses (B).
jr-2025-00036f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Indirect immunofluorescence assay for cytoplasmic-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (C-ANCA), confirmed by positive proteinase-3 (PR-3) antibody.
jr-2025-00036f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography. A: A newly developed left hilar mass is observed (arrow). B: Bilateral main bronchus narrowing (arrowhead) and multiple cavitary lesions (arrow) are also newly identified.
jr-2025-00036f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Nasal endoscopy and computed tomography (CT) view. Severe crusting around the middle turbinate is observed (A). The middle turbinate is absent due to inflammation on nasal endoscopy (B) and on CT (C).
jr-2025-00036f4.jpg

References

1) Wegener F. Über generalisierte, septische Gefässerkrankungen. Verh Dtsch Pathol Ges 1936 29:202–9. German.

2) Srouji I, Andrews P, Edwards C, Lund VJ. Patterns of presentation and diagnosis of patients with Wegener’s granulomatosis: ENT aspects. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121(7):653–8.
crossref pmid
3) Xiao F, Lü W, Ni D, Yu H. [Misdiagnosis analysis of Wegener’s granulomatosis in otorhinolaryngology]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 2005 19(7):295–6. Chinese.
pmid
4) Park KT, Kong IG, Han DH, Kim DW, Kim SH, Rhee CS, et al. Clinical experiences of diagnosis and treatment for Wegener’s granulomatosis. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2008;51(12):1109–18.

5) Lloyd G, Lund VJ, Beale T, Howard D. Rhinologic changes in Wegener’s granulomatosis. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116(7):565–9.
crossref pmid
6) Trimarchi M, Sinico RA, Teggi R, Bussi M, Specks U, Meroni PL. Otorhinolaryngological manifestations in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's). Autoimmun Rev 2013;12(4):501–5.
crossref pmid
7) Holle JU, Gross WL, Holl-Ulrich K, Ambrosch P, Noelle B, Both M, et al. Prospective long-term follow-up of patients with localised Wegener’s granulomatosis: does it occur as persistent disease stage? Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69(11):1934–9.
crossref pmid
8) Borner U, Landis BN, Banz Y, Villiger P, Ballinari P, Caversaccio M, et al. Diagnostic value of biopsies in identifying cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–negative localized Wegener’s granulomatosis presenting primarily with sinonasal disease. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012;26(6):475–80.
crossref pmid pdf
9) Wojciechowska J, Krajewski W, Krajewski P, Kręcicki T. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis in otolaryngologist practice: a review of current knowledge. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2016;9(1):8–13.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
10) Gottschlich S, Ambrosch P, Kramkowski D, Laudien M, Buchelt T, Gross W, et al. Head and neck manifestations of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Rhinology 2006;44(4):227–33.
pmid
11) Leavitt RY, Fauci AS, Bloch DA, Michel BA, Hunder GG, Arend WP, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33(8):1101–7.
crossref pmid
12) Jones RB, Tervaert JW, Hauser T, Luqmani R, Morgan MD, Peh CA, et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated renal vasculitis. N Engl J Med 2010;363(3):211–20.
pmid
13) Lutalo PM, D’Cruz DP. Diagnosis and classification of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (aka Wegener’s granulomatosis). J Autoimmun 2014;48-49:94–8.
crossref pmid
14) Robson JC, Grayson PC, Ponte C, Suppiah R, Craven A, Judge A, et al. 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2022;74(3):393–9.
crossref pmid pdf
15) Seo P, Stone JH. The antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitides. Am J Med 2004;117(1):39–50.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 2 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 3,125 View
  • 36 Download
Related articles

Two Cases of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis Presenting With Rhinologic Manifestations2026 July;33(2)

Practical Review of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps2021 November;28(3)



Editorial Office
101 Hyundai ESA Apt., 20, Hyoryeong-ro 77-gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06628, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-2-3461-9945    Fax: +82-2-3461-9947    E-mail: office@j-rhinology.org                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Rhinologic Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next