INTRODUCTION
Acute invasive fungal infection (AIFI) of the nasal cavity and external nose is an infectious disease caused by fungi such as
Mucor,
Rhizopus, and
Aspergillus. It occurs mainly when the immune response deteriorates after transplantation and can also occur in case of neutropenia led by the administration of immunosuppressants or chemotherapy, uncontrolled diabetes, autoimmune disease, etc. [
1]. If the fungus invades the mucous membranes of the nasal cavity or sinuses, mucosal edema, degenerative change such as dryness or paleness, and persistent crusting can be observed in endoscopic examination. When a thrombus is formed after it further progresses to a blood vessel, it causes ulcers and necrotic lesions of the skin and mucous membranes [
2].
AIFI is a rare disease but has a high mortality rate. Therefore, it is important to make sure that doctors conduct an active differential diagnosis to prevent any delay in treatment when mucosal lesions in the nasal cavity are observed in immunocompromised patients.
Intranasal herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection is mainly caused by HSV type-1 [
3]. It appears as clustered blisters or ulcers in skin lesions accompanied by symptoms such as erythematous changes, and causes pain, itching, and burning. However, it can be expressed in various clinical manifestations in immunocompromised patients and is sometimes confused with cutaneous lymphoma because lymphocyte infiltration is accompanied by histopathology [
4]. The authors analyzed two cases of HSV infection, not AIFI, in a biopsy for diagnosis of necrotic lesions of the nasal mucosa and skin surrounding the external nose in immunocompromised patients in order to provide clinical clues of HSV infection and examine the diagnosis and treatment of two diseases with completely different prognosis and treatment methods.
DISCUSSION
HSV is a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid virus with a pathophysiology of latent infection in neural tissues such as dorsal root ganglion, sympathetic ganglion, and peripheral nerve after primary infection, and is activated depending on the systemic and immune status. In the head and neck area, the infection occurs due to gingivostomatitis, pharyngotonsillitis, and eye infection [
3]. Clustered blisters, erythematous changes, and crusts are observed after the infection and accompanied by symptoms such as pain, itchiness, and burning sensation. However, atypical clinical features can be exhibited [
4] in immunocompromised patients and may be expressed similarly to AIFI with a high mortality rate.
Differentiating between HSV infection and AIFI is very critical because AIFI has only 50%–60% of a 6-month survival rate [
1,
5] and treatments such as rapid antifungal treatment, early debridement of mucosal lesions, and correction of underlying diseases are important for prognosis [
6]. In fact, it is reported in some papers that early debridement and rapid recovery of absolute neutrophil counts improve the survival rate of AIFI [
1,
7,
8].
AIFI is characterized by mucosal edema, pallor, dry nasal mucosa, necrotic tissue, and repeated intranasal crusts, and concentrated mucus of green, brown, or gray color may be observed when accompanied by rhinosinusitis [
3]. For immunocompromised patients, AIFI is accompanied by ocular invasion in about 32%, and the 6.5% may progress as intracranial invasion. Such complications can be evaluated through magnetic resonance imaging. In computed tomography, symptoms such as nasal and sinus mucosal edema similar to bacterial sinusitis and bone erosion in the late stage of infection can be confirmed. However, the diagnostic value of imaging tests for AIFI is not high due to the low sensitivity and specificity of tests [
9].
Therefore, it is necessary to preferentially identify AIFI by synthesizing risk factors and underlying disease history when nasal skin and intranasal mucosal lesions with necrotic change occur in the nose of immunocompromised patients, rather than simply referring to clinical findings or imaging tests, and then perform a frozen section biopsy to check the presence of fungi in the tissue for a quick and accurate diagnosis. Unlike HSV infection, infiltration of inflammatory cells is not usually observed in H&E staining, and fungi mixed with fibrous tissue in the blood vessel wall and intravascular space can be more easily distinguished in silver staining and periodic acid-Schiff staining. In 30% of AIFI patients, the fungal culture can be tested negative. Then, in situ hybridization for the pathological tissue makes it possible to confirm the fungal infection even when the culture test comes out negative and identify the type of fungal infection [
10–
12]. HSV infection can also be differentiated by pathologic findings after biopsy, but in some patients, clinical and simple pathological findings do not provide sufficient diagnostic evidence and additional inspections may be performed such as staining, Tzank smearing, virus culture test [
4]. They are pathologically characterized by cell degeneration such as enlarged and pale keratinocytes with steel gray nuclei, marginated chromatin, multinucleated cells, and eosinophilic intranuclear inclusion. When tissue is accompanied by necrosis, the infection is not limited to the epidermis, but invades the structure of the body such as sebaceous glands and hair follicles in the dermis, and a large number of inflammatory cells are infiltrated. For this case, it is necessary to differentiate it from benign skin lesions such as hematological tumors, lupus, rosacea, erythema multiforme, and Wegener’s granulomatosis and performing staining using HSV PCR swab, in situ hybridization, HSV antibody allows detailed and accurate diagnosis including virus subtypes (type 1 and 2). In the case of serological tests, it is highly likely to be false-positive as most people possess high levels of HSV antibodies. Therefore, a single serological test is not effective in diagnosis [
4,
13].
The authors performed frozen-section biopsy with suspicion of AIFI for necrotic lesions of the nasal skin and intranasal mucosa in immunocompromised patients. Based on the result, there was no fungal infection in both cases and the final biopsy confirms the infection as HSV type-1. However, these cases were different from typical HSV skin infection as they were not accompanied by characteristic blisters or severe hemorrhagic lesions. The scope of the lesions in both cases was not limited to mucosal edema and ulcerative changes in the nasal and nasal septum, and erythematous changes and hemorrhagic scabs were accompanied in the skin around the nose including the nasal tip and alar rim. For both cases, ulcerative lesions accompanied by lesions were identified when scabs were removed. Unlike AIFI, which mainly showed crusts accompanied by old clots, these hemorrhagic lesions were characterized by mixed fresh blood. In both cases, ulcerative lesions accompanied by pallor and erythematous changes were additionally confirmed in the oral cavity and gums in both cases. This is consistent with the fact that HSV type-1 is most commonly expressed as gingivostomatitis [
3], and it does not show typical herpetiform lesions or prodromal symptoms when the rare infection of the nasal mucosa occurs [
14]. Therefore, if intranasal mucosal lesions are found in immunocompromised hosts, confirming whether the presence of skin lesions in nasal cavity adjacent to columella outside the mucosa and oral mucosal lesions are present will be a clue to distinguish HSV infection from AIFI. However, for immunocompromised patients, oral mucosal lesions accompanied by ulcerative changes can also be caused by other etiologies such as Epstein-Barr virus and
Cytomegalovirus besides HSV infection and can also occur in oral mucositis and aphthous stomatitis after chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Therefore, careful examination is necessary [
3].
The prognosis is usually good for HSV infection as in case 2 if intravenous infusion of an appropriate antiviral agent, application of topical ointment, and correction of underlying diseases and immune-decreasing factors are combined together, and other papers also confirm the improvement within 2 weeks [
13,
15]. Therefore, if there was no fungus in the frozen section biopsy for the nasal lesions in immunocompromised patients, immunostaining or HSV intranasal polymerase chain reaction smear should be performed to identify HSV infection. Proactive antiviral treatment can lead to a positive clinical prognosis.
Since the number of reported cases of nasal skin and intranasal HSV infection in immunocompromised patients is not large at home and abroad [
13,
15], the authors performed biopsy and imaging tests with suspicion of AIFI. When necrotic lesions on the nasal mucosa and skin around the nose were expressed in immunocompromised hosts through the diagnosis and treatment process of case 2, they tried to provide clinical clues for diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. We believe this discussion is clinically meaningful.